> I will say this: adding a dedicated tag <foreign-type-spec> -- that will be > used only on one page ever -- seems kind of silly. On the other hand, the > more generic tag <specifier> seems to be incompatible with how chicken-doc is > currently implemented and used. So we may have to resort to a dedicated tag.
I would suggest a "<type>" tag, which can be used for foreign- and (forthcoming) specialization type specifiers. It is generic enough to be re-usable for different type-related purposes and having multiple entities of type "type" in the same document is confusing enough for the reader to be avoided. cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
