Jean-Philippe Théberge scripsit: > I guess (but maybe I'm wrong) that in some case, code written directly in > C will be better than the C generated by chicken.
Floating-point code is not good, it's true, because Chicken boxes all floats, but Web development doesn't need much of that. Integer processing loses something by being in Chicken, but almost everything else is about as good in Chicken as in C, I'd say. > How is the readeability of the chicken generated C? I would say that you can eventually decipher it with practice, but it is certainly not meant for readability. Furthermore, each Scheme procedure is broken into many C procedures with arbitrary names. -- First known example of political correctness: John Cowan After Nurhachi had united all the other http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Jurchen tribes under the leadership of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manchus, his successor Abahai (1592-1643) issued an order that the name Jurchen should --S. Robert Ramsey, be banned, and from then on, they were all The Languages of China to be called Manchus. _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
