-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:05:05 +0900 > Von: "Alex Shinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> SRFI-56 did go through a peer review - that's what the SRFI process > is. The reason for the withdrawal was explained on the list. As a > library > of binary parsing utilities it was fine, but I felt it failed to > adequately address > the distinction between binary and textual files, and I didn't want to > encourage people to build on a non-solid foundation. Hi: But what is the alternative? Or what srfi comes close to srfi-56. That kind of things of binary input output WITH big_endian or small_endian issues are sometimes very important. regards, Siegfried -- GMX FreeMail: 1 GB Postfach, 5 E-Mail-Adressen, 10 Free SMS. Alle Infos und kostenlose Anmeldung: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freemail _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
