Hi Mark, On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:52:02 -0600 "Mark Fredrickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This idea dove tails with discussion last week of providing docstrings > for lambdas. Felix pointed out that there is a hook to capture lambda > documentation. Will this work for documenting eggs, which might also > have data types, parameters, other info? I'm not sure if that's a good way to provide full documentation for eggs and chicken. One of the problems I see is that there are other types of objects besides lambdas. The full documentation for eggs and chicken itself is more than the documentation of procedures and other objects. There are examples, authors, license sections etc, which are not source code. I'm afraid merging two sources of documentation (from source code files and, I guess, manually written doc files) can lead to confusion and "kludgeness". Best wishes, Mario _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
