This idea dove tails with discussion last week of providing docstrings for lambdas. Felix pointed out that there is a hook to capture lambda documentation. Will this work for documenting eggs, which might also have data types, parameters, other info?
Texi seems like a reasonable standard to me, FWIW. Cheers, -M > I think the best alternative would be having svnwiki tags to markup > chicken docs (which is possible). > > Something like: > > <procedure name="foo" args="bar baz" retval="string"> > <description>This is foo</description> > </procedure> > > From a known format, we can convert the wiki documentation to whatever > format we need and even have an interactive documentation system. The > current problem with the wiki documentation is that we don't have > semantic markup. > > Best wishes, > Mario > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Chicken-users mailing list > Chicken-users@nongnu.org > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users > _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
