2011/9/15 Felix <fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org>: > [...] > One question: would it be possible to optionally support SRFI-17 setters for > record slots? > [...]
Hello Felix, for SRFI-99 compliance, separate setter procedures must be generated. But the getter procedures generated by my implementation for mutable fields already have a SRFI-17 setter attached (check lines 217 through 222 of srfi-99.scm). Ciao, Thomas -- When C++ is your hammer, every problem looks like your thumb. _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
