From: Thomas Chust <ch...@web.de> Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] SRFI-99 record types for CHICKEN Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:32:14 +0200
> 2011/9/15 Felix <fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org>: >> [...] >> One question: would it be possible to optionally support SRFI-17 setters for >> record slots? >> [...] > > Hello Felix, > > for SRFI-99 compliance, separate setter procedures must be > generated. But the getter procedures generated by my implementation > for mutable fields already have a SRFI-17 setter attached (check lines > 217 through 222 of srfi-99.scm). Ah, excellent. This is really great. Thanks for making it available! cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
