Hi, On Tue, 08 Jul 2014 08:57:43 +0400 Yaroslav Tsarko <eriktsa...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Why don`t just add (use utf8) line explicitly to all the eggs that > handle strings? That will ultimately fix the problem and will clearly > indicate that egg performs string manipulations and is capable of > handling UTF-8 encoding. Or am I missing something? That'd be an option. In my opinion, it would probably make things slightly better, since ASCII characters can be represented by UTF-8 in a single byte. On the other hand, we risk breaking eggs that operate on latin1 text. UTF-8 support may also affect performance-sensitive code. Best wishes. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
