On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Michele La Monaca < mikele.chic...@lamonaca.net> wrote:
> > Wouldn't be simpler and more effective this other path? > > 1) keep current string functions as they are (i.e. byte-oriented) and > keep "abusers" abusing (and happy) > 2) provide new utf8/cursor-oriented functions where needed (e.g. > utf8-string-ref but not utf8-string-append) > It's the same thing - the module system can let you rename whichever way you prefer. I prefer strings to be strings and bytevectors to be bytevectors. -- Alex
_______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list Chicken-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
