Honestly, for my usecase, they are about the same. My main work with nng/zmq is implementing the actor model (I have two implementations, one for CHICKEN with nng, and a port for Common Lisp with zmq), so rep/req (and inproc pair for some sync when spawning an actor), nothing terribly complex.
The main benefit and the reason that I personally like zmq more, is CurveZMQ, which saves me having to implement encryption with tweetnacl, for example. Sure, I have the tls transport with nng but that's a bit of a main imo. El 1 de noviembre de 2021 4:09:06 a. m. GMT-03:00, Arnaud Bailly <arnaud.oq...@gmail.com> escribió: ><Slightly off-topic> >I am currently using 0MQ (not in chicken though) and have been looking at >nng for a while, but unsure how mature it is. >What's your feedback using it? What are you using it for? > >Just curious :) > > -- Ariela Wenner