Thanks a lot! I have started using zmq (from Haskell) to implement some networking for a protocol and I was quite pleased with experience so far. Did not implement any form of authent or security though, as we don't really plan to use zmq as is in production. I was wondering whether or not it would make to port what I have to nng given it seems to have more traction nowadays. Having TLS support is indeed interesting.
Regards, -- Arnaud Bailly - @dr_c0d3 On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 5:28 PM Ariela Wenner <aris...@disroot.org> wrote: > Honestly, for my usecase, they are about the same. > > My main work with nng/zmq is implementing the actor model (I have two > implementations, one for CHICKEN with nng, and a port for Common Lisp with > zmq), so rep/req (and inproc pair for some sync when spawning an actor), > nothing terribly complex. > > The main benefit and the reason that I personally like zmq more, is > CurveZMQ, which saves me having to implement encryption with tweetnacl, for > example. Sure, I have the tls transport with nng but that's a bit of a main > imo. > > El 1 de noviembre de 2021 4:09:06 a. m. GMT-03:00, Arnaud Bailly < > arnaud.oq...@gmail.com> escribió: > ><Slightly off-topic> > >I am currently using 0MQ (not in chicken though) and have been looking at > >nng for a while, but unsure how mature it is. > >What's your feedback using it? What are you using it for? > > > >Just curious :) > > > > > > -- > Ariela Wenner >
