Salut Evan,
thanks, I will do that... And the results seems better than I initially
thought...
Now I need a better way to validate the results, because I think the high
level evaluation I did previously was misleading... Looking at the data a
little closer, I seem to have reached a much better performance than I
thought, and the scenarios of with and without the resize corner are much
closer than I initially thought with these two changes...
So I'm going to work a bit more on making sure I have my numbers
straight, and then get the gurus to validate my fixes :-)
Thanks again!
BYE
MAD
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Evan Martin <e...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Marc-Andre Decoste <m...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
> > So these don't seem to be THE reason for this slow down... So I keep
> > digging... But I wonder if it would be worth it or not to commit these
> > changes anyway, since they do provide a small performance improvement (at
> > least in the scenario I'm working with, would be interesting to compare
> to
> > other scenarios, I may try that later today)...
>
> If you have improved page load performance as measured by the page
> cyclers, it would seem very reasonable to commit it. Though you
> probably want to run it by Darin first as there are a lot of subtle
> details to how painting works.
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
