But this is not official, just like the timely snapshots of Chromium during
the day.They are known to be unstable and, most importantly, not official.
Why can a Chromium build, simply based on the stable branch, not be
automatically built?
I mean, what hesitation is there?
Also, the resources to make that possible are really minimal, that is for
sure (right?). But I understand this is not the consideration here.
☆PhistucK
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 19:27, Ben Goodger (Google) <b...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Adam Barth<aba...@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, you should feel free to do that. I'm not sure what the
> > advantage of doing that would be. The Chromium builds don't
> > auto-update, so they quickly become out of date.
>
> The risk is non-technical people perceiving stable builds as Chromium
> being a consumer product - it isn't, its an open source project that
> products like Google Chrome are built on. So yeah, I would be hesitant
> for us to produce "official" stable builds that can't update. That
> shouldn't stop anyone else from doing so.
>
> -Ben
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
