Yeah, obviously, if you have the resources.And I am suggesting and
requesting that, merely for testing purposes. This could help people test
the binary up front without having to install, for example.
Web developers can use it as well as the community.
This will be a handy thing, anyway. Is there someone specific this should be
articulated to?
☆PhistucK
On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 20:36, Adam Barth <aba...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:53 AM, PhistucK<phist...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > But this is not official, just like the timely snapshots of Chromium
> during
> > the day.
> > They are known to be unstable and, most importantly, not official.
> > Why can a Chromium build, simply based on the stable branch, not be
> > automatically built? I mean, what hesitation is there?
>
> It could be. It's a matter of the weighing the costs in terms of user
> confusing against the benefits, which have not been articulated.
>
> > Also, the resources to make that possible are really minimal, that is for
> > sure (right?). But I understand this is not the consideration here.
>
> One of the great things about open source is that if this scratches an
> itch for you, you can build the binaries yourself and post them on
> your own web site.
>
> Adam
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
