On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 9:53 AM, PhistucK<phist...@gmail.com> wrote:
> But this is not official, just like the timely snapshots of Chromium during
> the day.
> They are known to be unstable and, most importantly, not official.
> Why can a Chromium build, simply based on the stable branch, not be
> automatically built? I mean, what hesitation is there?
It could be. It's a matter of the weighing the costs in terms of user
confusing against the benefits, which have not been articulated.
> Also, the resources to make that possible are really minimal, that is for
> sure (right?). But I understand this is not the consideration here.
One of the great things about open source is that if this scratches an
itch for you, you can build the binaries yourself and post them on
your own web site.
Adam
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
