On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:30 AM, David Levin <le...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Glenn Wilson <gwil...@chromium.org>wrote:
>
>> I'll take the action item to remove anyone in the rotation who is not
>> actively working on Webkit / is not a committer.
>>
>
> Oh no... now it will happen even more often :)
>
> Should there also be the reverse adding WebKit committers who are not
> gardeners to the rotation?
>
Yes, provided they are "actively contributing" to WebKit.
>
>
>> In the past, I've floated the idea in the past of having a "Webkit deputy"
>> who helps the gardener keep the canary green. I'm not sure if that would
>> help, though.
>>
>
> fwiw, earlier in the thread I gave 5 things that would definitely help --
> For those concerned about this issue, if you tackle these, it would make
> things go smoother.
>
> dave
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
