Yes, I think we're on the same page: you don't mean that the user has to click some UI element out-of-page (as the original proposal suggested), but that the script that triggers the out-of-page UI has to originate from a user action. -Nick
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Linus Upson <li...@google.com> wrote: > I was agreeing with Ben, I thought. > - in-page discovery ui > - script can't initiate out-of-page ui > - only user actions can bring up out-of-page ui > > Linus > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Nick Baum <nickb...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> I think Ben meant that the javascript would have to come from a user-click >> (just like for popups), which I totally support. >> For what it's worth, I think it will be better for the page to provide >> in-context discovery of this (in Gmail settings, for example), rather than >> force the user to discover an out-of-page UI. I really don't see this >> happening very often, so I'm not particularly worried about it being >> annoying. >> >> -Nick >> >> >> On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Linus Upson <li...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Yes. Please do not add more ways for script to instigate out-of-page UI. >>> It is all evil. >>> Linus >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) <b...@chromium.org >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> We should only allow this UI to be invoked from a user gesture. >>>> >>>> -Ben >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Jeremy Orlow <jor...@chromium.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> > What's to keep sites from spamming you? What if they spam you and >>>> then >>>> > later you decide you want to install it anyway? >>>> > I guess I misunderstood the model of this feature. Seeing the bit >>>> about the >>>> > rss feeds made me think that an app would use this to advertise that >>>> you >>>> > could install it. I didn't realize that we were assuming the API >>>> would only >>>> > be called after a user action. To be honest, I much prefer the rss >>>> feed way >>>> > of thinking about it. >>>> > I'm not a UI guy, though. :-) >>>> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) < >>>> b...@chromium.org> >>>> > wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> As a result, I think we should have a dialog here. It's similar to >>>> what >>>> >> Firefox does, too. >>>> >> -Ben >>>> >> >>>> >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Brian Rakowski <br...@chromium.org >>>> > >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> In general, we've been operating under the assumption that a >>>> >>> user-initiated gesture ("click here to make gmail your mailto >>>> handler") >>>> >>> results in a dialog. Non-user-initiated (site intitiated) results in >>>> an >>>> >>> infobar. If you've denied the infobar this in the past, the site >>>> will have >>>> >>> to get you to click on something in its UI to prompt you for this >>>> again. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Peter Kasting < >>>> pkast...@google.com> >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Jeremy Orlow < >>>> jor...@chromium.org> >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> If you click no on an info bar, then how would you later change >>>> your >>>> >>>>> mind? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I don't know. Maybe at that point the icon appears in the address >>>> bar. >>>> >>>> PK >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---