On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 2:14 PM, John Abd-El-Malek <j...@chromium.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Tony Chang <t...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> For reasons unknown to me, this line jumped back up. It seems it's because
>> of Matt's revert:
>> http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=rev&revision=32524
>>
>> This is a startup test, so it basically times how long it takes for
>> LaunchApp to return.  Maybe the methodology here is a bit off?
>>
>
> Yeah, I think New Tab tests are more important, since they measure what the
> user sees, not when internal APIs are called. In the case of the above
> change by Matt, New Tab Cold hasn't changed so I think it's fine to ignore
> the rise.
> http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/perf/linux-release-hardy/new-tab-ui-cold/report.html?history=150
>

New Tab hasn't changed because none of those tests load any extensions.
Maybe we should add some.


>
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Chase Phillips <c...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> t_ref shouldn't move, though, since it was isolated from your change.
>>>
>>> Tony, I don't think there's a problem with the graph pulling the wrong
>>> numbers.  I see the same difference between extension_toolstrip50 and
>>> extension_toolstrip1 when comparing the linux release hardy's graph values,
>>> the .dat file the graph code uses, and the output of the startup test
>>> itself.  I thought maybe extension_toolstrip50 could be using the reference
>>> build on accident, so I verified startup_test.cc runs extension_toolstrip50
>>> on the current build instead of the reference build (it does).
>>>
>>> Things look fine on Windows (the perf graph is what I'd expect, and
>>> running the test locally results in toolstrip50 results greater than
>>> toolstrip1).  These tests don't run on Mac.  We should run the tests on
>>> Linux to verify things look sane locally, too.  No explanation for the odd
>>> results yet.
>>>
>>> Chase
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:08 PM, John Abd-El-Malek <j...@chromium.org>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't have an answer to that.  The t_ref line didn't move either.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Tony Chang <t...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Why didn't the black line on the linux warm perf bot change?  It says
>>>>> that that is the extension_toolstrip50 test, which I would expect to run
>>>>> slower than the extension_toolstrip1 test.  Maybe the graph is pulling the
>>>>> wrong numbers?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/perf/linux-release-hardy/startup/report.html?history=150&graph=warm
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:53 AM, John Abd-El-Malek 
>>>>> <j...@chromium.org>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yep, that was my plan.  I'm planning on doing the same thing for the
>>>>>> rest of the child processes, and if I see any significant changes on the
>>>>>> perf test (which I don't expect), I'll update the reference builds again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Brett Wilson <bre...@google.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Darin Fisher <da...@chromium.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> > This sounds like goodness.  Updating the reference builds is
>>>>>>> usually a good
>>>>>>> > thing to do in cases like this so that new changes are easier to
>>>>>>> notice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We'll be doing this soon anyway. Al has a patch for the IPC message
>>>>>>> types running out which will break the reference build.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Brett
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  --
>>>>>> Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
>>>>>> View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
>>>> View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>  --
>> Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
>> View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
>>
>
>

-- 
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev

Reply via email to