On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:49 PM, John Gregg <john...@google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Peter Kasting <pkast...@google.com>wrote:
>
>> This is the sort of thing for which Profile::ServiceAccessType was
>> invented. Ideally, things like recording whitelisted popup hosts should
>> request IMPLICIT_ACCESS, which should result in no read happening.
>>
>
> From reading the code, I'm not sure that's consistent. Adding a
> whitelisted host for popups is a result of a user action (the user choosing
> "always allow" from the blocked popup container), so according to the code
> comments, that would be an explicit access. It's kind of a gray area: it's
> like adding a bookmark in terms of user-initiation, but it also affects web
> browsing.
>
Hmm. On the one hand, we persist things like created bookmarks and
downloaded files. On the other hand, we don't preserve changes due to other
"user actions" like clicking a link. It's not obvious to me what the best
example is.
PK
--
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
