Yes, Chrome does allow plugins. But the problem (well at least for Google) is the adblocker plugin. I mean, google makes profit from internet advertising... lol
On Sep 4, 10:50 am, sEver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Exactly. Most feature requests on this list so far are about > interface. Mouse gestures, some buttons here and there... if chrome > would allow extension mechanism similar to Firefox, so people could > make their own plugins, You could have any feature You like in there, > like in Firefox. > > On Sep 4, 10:49 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i agree with it... i a kind of miss add-ons from firefox. i think that > > even if you provide world-best user interface, without a possibility > > of easy extending it it might be not enough > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I installed Google Chrome just yesterday and i would say that i like > > > it very much, it's startup launch speed is perfect, interface is the > > > best i have used (Firefox and Opera), it's light-weight, clutter-less, > > > omni-bar and the search features are great, etc. the best thing is it > > > recognized all the installed plug-ins flash + silverlight and i > > > browsed several ria sites and it worked 95% of the time. although, > > > it's not displaying silverlight content on Microsoft web main page! > > > there is no full screen mode, but the maximized interface and custom > > > web applications make up for that so that almost not required. Themes > > > as well (only for me?) are not required. But it still misses some > > > basic things: > > > RSS, feeds subscription feature and add-ons. > > > but i think instead of add-ons, there should be an inbuilt feature > > > which acts like greasemonkey add-on Firefox, which would be able to > > > run html-tricks and other good harm-less scripts. > > > Because i think almost everything is possible using such scripts. So, > > > having a greasemonkey like feature built in to the Chrome itself, > > > there won't be any requirement for addons and the browser would still > > > be light. i think if many things are added like addons etc, then even > > > Chrome would take up much time to load and use even more resources. > > > I am now using both chrome and firefox, maybe i would switch to Chrome > > > later when some of these or other good features are added to it in the > > > final version. > > > I thank Chrome team for such a great browser! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
