Thats why they seem to be working on avoiding scope creep and letting
plugins do alot of the extra features people are asking for.

On Sep 5, 5:14 pm, V_RocKs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very beta but still nice, crisp, fast and usable...
>
> Question is... Will it be this fast after everything else is done?
>
> Windows is a fast operating system... When that is all you have on
> your system...
>
> V
>
> On Sep 4, 11:02 pm, bronsoja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Nope, the problem is they haven't finished the plugin api/architecture/
> > whatever yet.  The code is open source, if someone wanted to fork it
> > and make a browser with ad blocking built in, they could.  Google
> > couldn't stop them.  They aren't holding back plugin capabilities
> > because of someone eventually making an adblocking plugin.  They are
> > still working on a beta product with incomplete features, simple as
> > that.
>
> > On Sep 4, 9:04 pm, Spicy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Yes, Chrome does allow plugins. But the problem (well at least for
> > > Google) is the adblocker plugin. I mean, google makes profit from
> > > internet advertising... lol
>
> > > On Sep 4, 10:50 am, sEver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Exactly. Most feature requests on this list so far are about
> > > > interface. Mouse gestures, some buttons here and there... if chrome
> > > > would allow extension mechanism similar to Firefox, so people could
> > > > make their own plugins, You could have any feature You like in there,
> > > > like in Firefox.
>
> > > > On Sep 4, 10:49 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > i agree with it... i a kind of miss add-ons from firefox. i think that
> > > > > even if you provide world-best user interface, without a possibility
> > > > > of easy extending it it might be not enough
>
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > > > I installed Google Chrome just yesterday and i would say that i like
> > > > > > it very much, it's startup launch speed is perfect, interface is the
> > > > > > best i have used (Firefox and Opera), it's light-weight, 
> > > > > > clutter-less,
> > > > > > omni-bar and the search features are great, etc. the best thing is 
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > recognized all the installed plug-ins flash + silverlight and i
> > > > > > browsed several ria sites and it worked 95% of the time. although,
> > > > > > it's not displaying silverlight content on Microsoft web main page!
> > > > > > there is no full screen mode, but the maximized interface and custom
> > > > > > web applications make up for that so that almost not required. 
> > > > > > Themes
> > > > > > as well (only for me?) are not required. But it still misses some
> > > > > > basic things:
> > > > > > RSS, feeds subscription feature and add-ons.
> > > > > > but i think instead of add-ons, there should be an inbuilt feature
> > > > > > which acts like greasemonkey add-on Firefox, which would be able to
> > > > > > run html-tricks and other good harm-less scripts.
> > > > > > Because i think almost everything is possible using such scripts. 
> > > > > > So,
> > > > > > having a greasemonkey like feature built in to the Chrome itself,
> > > > > > there won't be any requirement for addons and the browser would 
> > > > > > still
> > > > > > be light. i think if many things are added like addons etc, then 
> > > > > > even
> > > > > > Chrome would take up much time to load and use even more resources.
> > > > > > I am now using both chrome and firefox, maybe i would switch to 
> > > > > > Chrome
> > > > > > later when some of these or other good features are added to it in 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > final version.
> > > > > > I thank Chrome team for such a great browser!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Chromium-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to