Very beta but still nice, crisp, fast and usable... Question is... Will it be this fast after everything else is done?
Windows is a fast operating system... When that is all you have on your system... V On Sep 4, 11:02 pm, bronsoja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nope, the problem is they haven't finished the plugin api/architecture/ > whatever yet. The code is open source, if someone wanted to fork it > and make a browser with ad blocking built in, they could. Google > couldn't stop them. They aren't holding back plugin capabilities > because of someone eventually making an adblocking plugin. They are > still working on a beta product with incomplete features, simple as > that. > > On Sep 4, 9:04 pm, Spicy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes, Chrome does allow plugins. But the problem (well at least for > > Google) is the adblocker plugin. I mean, google makes profit from > > internet advertising... lol > > > On Sep 4, 10:50 am, sEver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Exactly. Most feature requests on this list so far are about > > > interface. Mouse gestures, some buttons here and there... if chrome > > > would allow extension mechanism similar to Firefox, so people could > > > make their own plugins, You could have any feature You like in there, > > > like in Firefox. > > > > On Sep 4, 10:49 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > i agree with it... i a kind of miss add-ons from firefox. i think that > > > > even if you provide world-best user interface, without a possibility > > > > of easy extending it it might be not enough > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > I installed Google Chrome just yesterday and i would say that i like > > > > > it very much, it's startup launch speed is perfect, interface is the > > > > > best i have used (Firefox and Opera), it's light-weight, clutter-less, > > > > > omni-bar and the search features are great, etc. the best thing is it > > > > > recognized all the installed plug-ins flash + silverlight and i > > > > > browsed several ria sites and it worked 95% of the time. although, > > > > > it's not displaying silverlight content on Microsoft web main page! > > > > > there is no full screen mode, but the maximized interface and custom > > > > > web applications make up for that so that almost not required. Themes > > > > > as well (only for me?) are not required. But it still misses some > > > > > basic things: > > > > > RSS, feeds subscription feature and add-ons. > > > > > but i think instead of add-ons, there should be an inbuilt feature > > > > > which acts like greasemonkey add-on Firefox, which would be able to > > > > > run html-tricks and other good harm-less scripts. > > > > > Because i think almost everything is possible using such scripts. So, > > > > > having a greasemonkey like feature built in to the Chrome itself, > > > > > there won't be any requirement for addons and the browser would still > > > > > be light. i think if many things are added like addons etc, then even > > > > > Chrome would take up much time to load and use even more resources. > > > > > I am now using both chrome and firefox, maybe i would switch to Chrome > > > > > later when some of these or other good features are added to it in the > > > > > final version. > > > > > I thank Chrome team for such a great browser! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
