I think everyone who has commented to date on this film is treating this film far too seriously.
It is freely based on a work of fiction 'The Churchill Secret KBO' by Jonathan Smith. The critical word here is 'fiction'. There is no point in trying to relate it to the actual facts of the situation, even if anyone, living or otherwise, believes they know what they really were. After all, the whole event was kept secret, so the real truth is pretty difficult to ascertain. The character of the nurse is freely admitted to be fictional, as are some of the other situations portrayed in the film. Fundamentally, the piece should be viewed as a largely fictional drama, and in my view, as well as that of several of my fellow volunteer House Stewards at Chartwell at least, it was well produced with some good performances and enjoyable in its own right. David Riddle Sent from my iPhone > On 13 Sep 2016, at 18:11, Cita Stelzer <c...@irwinstelzer.com> wrote: > > Whether “Churchill‘s Secret”, broadcast in the USA last night, was riveting > television I leave to the critics. But that it was historically inaccurate at > one important point there is no doubt. Lindsay Duncan’s beautifully acted > television version of Clemmie as a wife competing with his political career > for his time and attention has no relation to the real-life version. > Clementine Churchill, as I point out in my review of Sonia Purnell’s > biography of Clementine Churchill, was no whining woman at odds with her > husband’s political life. In fact, Clemmie was a full partner in his > political career, entertaining politicians and military figures when he was > away in the trenches in WWI. And as any fair reading of their voluminous > correspondence shows, offering wise advice to the often impetuous-Winston, > advice that prolonged his career. Not only was she a full partner in his > work, she had a full and rich life of her own, witness her fund-raising work > for the Red Cross’s Aid to the Soviet Union. Kudos to Ms. Duncan, and don’t > blame her for being asked to portray the fiction of a novelist’s imagination. > > Cita Stelzer > > > > > > Cita Stelzer > > Please note new email address: > c...@irwinstelzer.com > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ChurchillChat" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to churchillchat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to churchillchat@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/churchillchat. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ChurchillChat" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to churchillchat+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to churchillchat@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/churchillchat. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
