Colla Walla or drug smug? Australian wallabies are eating opium poppies and creating crop circles as they hop around "as high as a kite", a government official has said. Lara Giddings, the attorney general for the island state of Tasmania, said the kangaroo-like marsupials were getting into poppy fields grown for medicine . This is from BBC 'Stoned wallabies make crop circles' at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8118257.stm
This article is a repeat of a similar one. Though it is listed on hottest of BBCs read-list it is not even listed on the Internet drop list and buried on the Asian-Pacific area page. Why so hot? Why so hot even when so buried? Is it the funny part or the not so funny? Now this in New York Times. Was on front page: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/12/health/12medicaid.html?hp (quote) Poor Children Likelier to Get Antipsychotics New federally financed drug research reveals a stark disparity: children covered by Medicaid are given powerful antipsychotic medicines at a rate four times higher than children whose parents have private insurance. And the Medicaid children are more likely to receive the drugs for less severe conditions than their middle-class counterparts, the data shows . (unquote) Putting these two stories together you can see how illegal drugs and pharma have combined to addict as many as possible illegally or legally. What are kids doing on antipsychotics anyway? Seems mostly for being noisy and for being kids. Easier when they sit stoned in front of the TV. Other Wallaby story showed too much grown for just morphine. Leads to questions that we dont want to ask ourselves such as: 1- Laws dont work. Medicine is controlled. What does work? Only change in public attitudes--- but how? Must think in terms of general public.., Joe-six-pack. 2- So many complain about illegal drugs being the money to support inside international CIA-type security operations. I say CIA-type as CIA and KGB were combined in early fifties with other nuclear powers to form inside security to secret non-use-of-nuke deals. Same op is security for anything else now up to nanotech. These activities cost. How else would you fund? Seriously. This is facing life on lifes terms, not relying on dreamy platitudes. If this were to seriously be replaced you might need to start with throwing out political isms. This is not undoable with the masses, but difficult. Example from another conversation: There was talk about CIA Director Adm. Stansfield Turner when he tossed knuckledraggers. Adm. Turner somehow got the mad idea that he could rely entirely on technology, i.e. listening devices, and therefore did not need humtel human intelligence operatives. First thing was that thousands of humtels simply went off reservation to the other side for jobs. No biggie, a job is a job. At higher levels there is no off reservation. To put that in another frame realize that spying must be legal in the real world but has only remained illegal because with the masses the patriot game works and other games dont. So we lie. We level, we compartmentalize, we paste confused-grin over knowing-smirk. To a great extent this is a psychological exercise. The upper chit-chat now is the Red Book, the book that was written by Carl Jung that his family would not allow published until 2001 as it would have made him look a bit whacky. (A new copy is $114.00 bucks!) In the Red Book he states that the ultimate process is your own inward venture. But mine seems to go in two areas. One is the nice-nice talk of new-age. Many of these things I believe in. Another is real world horror. I have seen first hand the horrors of crack and how evil it is that we foster that on Blacks but only cocaine on Whites. But trying to fix that is asking to be permanently fixed yourself. Life on lifes terms means life has its own terms. I hear 'CIA and drugs', sob sob..., 'CIA and drugs', sob sob.... So what is the real solution? In other words: I am just seeing what happens when I switch icons. Where do you get in the zone? m
