http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/opinion/article/19830.html

May 14, 2009 

Editorial

Labor Law Reform Must Not Hurt Firms
Indonesia's labor laws badly need to be revamped. The government's plan to 
scrap the contract worker scheme, however, is not the answer and instead will 
exacerbate an already bad situation. 

There is no denying that Indonesia has one of the most rigid labor laws in the 
world. It is nearly impossible to release workers, even those who are not 
productive, much less those who abuse company rules and regulations. According 
to US economist Steven H. Hanke, it costs an average of 108 weeks of an 
employee's salary to fire a worker in this country. 

This is both unacceptable and uneconomical, and makes bad business sense. To 
get around this issue, companies have opted to hire workers on contracts rather 
than on a permanent basis. If this small window of opportunity for companies is 
shut, it will lead to severe cost increases and possibly put thousands of 
small- and medium-sized companies out of business. 

The ill-conceived Labor Law is also bad for the workers themselves for three 
main reasons. The law has forced employers to move millions of employees to 
contract status, thus depriving these workers the security of long-term 
employment. But employers have been compelled to take such action out of 
necessity rather than choice just to stay in business. 

The existing Labor Law has also been detrimental to new entrants to the labor 
market. Statistics indicate that out of a 112-million-strong labor pool, only 
28.7 million are employed in the formal sector. And of this number, 60 percent 
are contract workers. 

The timing for undertaking such action is woefully off. In the heat of a 
presidential election, such a move will be seen as populist and thus will not 
be given the necessary review and attention it needs and deserves. Populist 
policies are often made for the wrong reasons and are based on misconstrued 
assumptions and have long-term negative affects that are difficult to rectify. 

The more important issue, however, is the government's underlying philosophy 
with regard to labor as a crucial component of economic development. 

At the moment, the philosophy is unclear, if indeed there is one. Workers' 
rights need to be fully protected but not at the expense of employers. Workers 
who feel that they have been mistreated or unlawfully fired by employers should 
have the right to challenge their dismissal. 

On the other hand, employers must be given the flexibility to hire and retrench 
workers according to economic and business conditions without having to pay out 
crippling compensation packages. 

A balance between employers' and workers' rights need to be achieved for the 
good of the country as a whole. If not, economic development will be stymied 
and future entrants to the work force will be left out in the cold. 

Kirim email ke