Burkhard Plaum wrote: > Hi, > > Richard Spindler schrieb: >> 2008/1/30, Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Martin> (For Qt), Is it possible for the community (ie anyone outside >>> Martin> TrollTech) to write user interface widgets? Cin3 will need to >>> Martin> write some specialist widgets -- how will this fit in with the >>> Martin> toolkit and the toolkit's development process? >>> >>> No idea. Let me just say that GTK+ toolkit is getting native on Mac OS >>> X, works on Win and it's not property of Nokia ;) >> >> Writing Custom Widgets is possible in every Toolkit, and Qt has been >> "native" OSX for a long time. But indeed, GTK seems to catch up. >> >> Discussing Toolkits is pointless btw. without someone actually writing >> the Code for said toolkit. > > Actually I didn't want to participate in toolkit discussions, but if we > agree, that > > 1. All plugin interfaces are C because this is the smallest common base to make it bindable to other languages. The idea is to make the plugin interface easy bindable to other languages.
> > 2. Plugins should be allowed to make their own configuration widgets > > we are already restricted to a C-toolkit or not? C binding would be sufficent, and it should not do too much, just being an UI toolkit and not expect we will use its object system/types for anything else than the GUI. > > Burkhard > > _______________________________________________ > Cinelerra mailing list > Cinelerra@skolelinux.no > https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
