2008/6/20 Ichthyostega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ...if videojack was already there and mature enough to meet the
> feature set of Cinelerra, then probably we'd go a similar route as
> Ardour did for sound.
> Last year, as our first planning started, I considered shortly to
> create something new, which would be sort-of a jack-for-video, and
> to build the whole App on top of it.

The Problem that I see with video-jack when compared to audio-jack is
the following.

For an application like Ardour, audio-jack provides reliable access to
high-end multi-channel audio hardware. Video-Jack however, in its
current state does not help in getting high-end Video-IO-Boards to
work with an application, it is only good for routing video between
apps, which is nice, but imho not the most interesting part. I'd
rather have a solid API to access Video-Capture (and Playback) boards
in an universal and simple, yet reliable and performant way.

Cheers
-Richard

-- 
Don't contribute to the Y10K problem!

_______________________________________________
Cinelerra mailing list
[email protected]
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra

Reply via email to