Then it's pretty clear that the BRAS is in control, and may be using "max-lease time" rather than "default-lease time".
If I review the DHCP logs for a well-behaved PPPoE/A link I should probably be able to figure it out. Regards, Frank -----Original Message----- From: Gert Doering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 9:51 AM To: Frank Bulk Cc: 'Eric Helm'; [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PPPoE and DHCP Hi, On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 07:35:46PM -0500, Frank Bulk wrote: > What's not clear to me is who handles DHCP renewals....if the router > requests that from the external DHCP server and uses IPCP to pass that on to > the PPPoA/E client, or the PPPoA/E client initates that and the router > tracks it. As there is no way to signal a lease time via IPCP, and no way (besides closing and re-establishing IPCP) to renew the address received by IPCP, I see the latter as "quite unlikely". gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED] fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
