On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:27 AM, Phil Mayers <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:07:13PM +0000, Justin Shore wrote: >> >> Arie & Christian, >> >> Thanks for the replies. So re-using HSRP group #s doesn't create any > > Correct, it works fine. > >> conflicts? That's good to know. It also won't reduce the load? That's >> unfortunately. For some reason I had it in my mind that you could create >> some sort of collective HSRP instance over a common L2 infrastructure that >> would share hellos and switch as one common unit. It would be list MST for >> HSRP essentially. > > That's the "HSRP multiple group optimisation" which is available on SXI and > SRsomething, but sadly it supports routed subints on the same master > physical int *only* - no SVIs: > > int Gi1/1.1 > standby name foo > ! other config > int Gi1/1.2 > standby follow foo > ! other config > > Attempting to configure on SVIs gives some random error message about > "different physical parent interfaces". I can't see any reason for the > restriction - I keep meaning to put an RFE in.
Why would you expect it to work on an SVI? Nothing else does... After discovering this we put in a feature request. Not expecting it to go anywhere though. Tim:> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
