Yes, the external routes are in both PE's.

I am rebuilding it in gns3, to see if I can reproduce it.

Yuri Bank wrote:
What does the routing table for the customer VRF look like on the PE? Do
you see the external routes advertised by its neighboring CE?

-Yuri

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Joe Maimon <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Perhaps something like this shows what I ran into better - I'll have
    to try and see if I can build it in a lab.

    The CE would not see the connected routes of the other CE's, unless
    a network statement is used instead of redistribute connected.

    CE#1

    hostname cust1-ce1
    int l0
    ip address 10.255.255.255 255.255.255.255
    !
    int fa0/0
    ip address 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
    !
    int s0/0
    ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.255.252
    !
    router eigrp 100
    redistribute connected
    network 172.16.0.0 0.0.0.255
    no auto-summary


    PE#1

    ip vrf cust1
    rd 65000:1
    route-target export 65000:1
    route-target import 65000:1
    !
    int l0
    ip address 1.0.0.0 255.255.255.255
    !
    int fa0/0
    ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
    mpls ldp discovery transport-address interface
    mpls label protocol ldp
    mpls ip
    mpls mtu 1548
    !
    int s0/0
    desc cust1-ce1
    ip vrf for cust1
    ip address 172.16.0.2 255.255.255.252
    !
    router ospf 1
    network 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0.0.0.0
    !
    router eigrp 1
    passive-interface default
    no passive-interface s0/0
    !
    address-family ipv4 vrf cust1
    redistribute bgp 65000 metric 6000 100 255 100 1500
    network 172.16.0.0 0.0.0.255
    autonomous-system 100
    no auto-summry
    eigrp router-id 172.16.0.2
    !
    router bgp 65000
    neighbor 1.0.0.1 remote-as 65000
    neighbor 1.0.0.1 update-source loopback0
    !
    address-family ipv4
    neighbor 1.0.0.1 send-community both
    !
    address-family vpnv4
    neighbor 1.0.0.1 send-community extended
    !
    address-family ipv4 vrf cust1
    redistribute eigrp 100
    no synchronization
    !


    PE#2


    ip vrf cust1
    rd 65000:1
    route-target export 65000:1
    route-target import 65000:1
    !
    int l0
    ip address 1.0.0.1 255.255.255.255
    !
    int fa0/0
    ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
    mpls ldp discovery transport-address interface
    mpls label protocol ldp
    mpls ip
    mpls mtu 1548
    !
    int s0/0
    desc cust1-ce2
    ip vrf for cust1
    ip address 172.16.0.6 255.255.255.252
    !
    router ospf 1
    network 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0.0.0.0
    !
    router eigrp 1
    passive-interface default
    no passive-interface s0/0
    !
    address-family ipv4 vrf cust1
    redistribute bgp 65000 metric 6000 100 255 100 1500
    network 172.16.0.0 0.0.0.255
    autonomous-system 100
    no auto-summry
    eigrp router-id 172.16.0.6
    !
    router bgp 65000
    neighbor 1.0.0.2 remote-as 65000
    neighbor 1.0.0.2 update-source loopback0
    !
    address-family ipv4
    neighbor 1.0.0.2 send-community both
    !
    address-family vpnv4
    neighbor 1.0.0.2 send-community extended
    !
    address-family ipv4 vrf cust1
    redistribute eigrp 100
    no synchronization

    CE#2



    hostname cust1-ce2
    int l0
    ip address 10.255.255.0 255.255.255.255
    !
    int fa0/0
    ip address 10.1.255.0 255.255.255.0
    !
    int s0/0
    ip address 172.16.0.5 255.255.255.252
    !
    router eigrp 100
    redistribute connected
    network 172.16.0.0 0.0.0.255
    no auto-summary





    Luan Nguyen wrote:

        Just put this into Dynamips and didn't have any problem at all.

        CE1#
        router eigrp 1
          no auto-summary
          !
          address-family ipv4 vrf BLUE
          redistribute bgp 1 metric 1 1 1 1 1
          network 10.10.10.254 0.0.0.0
          no auto-summary
          autonomous-system 1
          exit-address-family

        PE1#
        router eigrp 1
          no auto-summary
          !
          address-family ipv4 vrf BLUE
          network 10.10.10.254 0.0.0.0
          no auto-summary
          autonomous-system 1
          exit-address-family


        router bgp 1
        !
          address-family ipv4 vrf BLUE
          redistribute eigrp 1
          no auto-summary
          no synchronization
          exit-address-family

        Maybe check the EIGRP configuration to see if you have thing
        like eigrp stub
        connected :)

        -------------------------------------
        Luan Nguyen
        Chesapeake NetCraftsmen, LLC.
        -------------------------------------


        -----Original Message-----
        From: [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        [mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Joe Maimon
        Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 8:19 PM
        To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Redistributing External EIGRP routes
        through MPLS vpn

        Metric Must Be Configured for Routes from Other Autonomous
        Systems and
        Non-EIGRP Networks

        Yes, it is.

        Native EIGRP VRF to VRF Redistribution Is Not Supported

        Not what I am trying to do.

        Thanks,

        Joe

        Shimol Shah wrote:

            Are you sure you are not running into restriction cited in
            below section
            of the CCO document ?


        
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t15/feature/guide/fteipece.htm
        l#wp1027175



            Shimol Shah


            On 5/17/10 2:57 PM, Joe Maimon wrote:

                Hey All,

                Seems like I have run into a difficulty where CE#1
                external EIGRP routes
                (redistribute connected/redistribute static) are learned
                by PE#1,
                redistributed to PE#2, but not redistributed to CE#2

                CE<->  PE, EIGRP

                PE<->  PE, MPLS/BGP

                The workaround is to use network statements, making the
                EIGRP routes on
                the CE internal. Those redistribute fine and show up on
                CE#2 as internal.

                Am I missing something and is there a simple clean way
                to redistribute
                from CE#1 to CE#2 external EIGRP routes?

                Thanks,

                Joe
                _______________________________________________
                cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
                <mailto:[email protected]>
                https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
                archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

            _______________________________________________
            cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
            archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


        _______________________________________________
        cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
        archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

        __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
        virus signature
        database 5123 (20100518) __________

        The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

        http://www.eset.com




        __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of
        virus signature
        database 5123 (20100518) __________

        The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

        http://www.eset.com



    _______________________________________________
    cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
    archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to