No offense taken at all :o)

Just trying to soak up as much of the experience/gotchas/best 
practices/insight/etc that others have been through on this list and apply that 
to my environment.....

-Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Gert Doering [mailto:g...@greenie.muc.de] 
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 12:15 PM
To: Jeff Wojciechowski
Cc: 'g...@greenie.muc.de'; 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Ethernet Interfaces Speed and Duplex - Force or Auto

Hi,

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:07:36PM -0500, Jeff Wojciechowski wrote:
> I have done most of my learning this century so I am still somewhat 
> green - hence my post - and I have learned much by picking the brains 
> of vetrans.

I wasn't trying to pick on you - sorry if it came across that way.

It's more a matter of personal annoyance at network admins that refuse to 
acknowledge that devices change and problems evolve, and insist that "the rules 
that we have learned last century are cast in stone and must be followed to the 
end".  The auto-neg/no auto-neg discussion is very prototypical for that :-)

(Nothing bad in "learning from experience and designing rules/BCPs from there", 
but there must be room for adjustment and new experience every few years...)

gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to