On 30/06/2010 17:54, Jon Lewis wrote: > Have to? Maybe not...but I bet they'd get flooded with requests. The RIRs > can't guarantee general routability, but it seems disingenuous of them to > assign a /27 to a multihomed network when it's well known that a /27 won't > work for them...unless they only plan to use that /27 internally and use PA > space for their BGP announced route.
The RIPE NCC address policy people are disinterested in routing, although not uninterested. Nick _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
