Hi Pete,
Did not switch out the underlying VIP in this case. We installed a
VIP4-80 with a PA-GE. I have a few other chassis that are running this
fine, but they are running older IOS versions than this one. Just
thought it was unusual that we would see such high CPU on the VIP. I
get the same performance with the GEIP which is a VIP2-50, hence the
reason I called out the VIP types in the original post.
We also see the same performance on a regular VIP2-50 with a PA-FE-TX
in it. Anything at 10Mbps or above cause the VIP to use 99% CPU which
does not seem right. I would just roll this chassis back to the same
IOS as the other ones, but need this version for the MFR support.
I did notice that this card is using flow-control where all my others
are showing "flow-control is unsupported". I have looked but have not
found a way to disable this.
-Troy
On Jul 7, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Pete Templin wrote:
On 7/6/2010 3:10 PM, Troy Beisigl wrote:
Not much to the config. I have included both sides of the
connection. the other end is a 6500
7507:
interface GigabitEthernet6/0/0
description feed to cat1.3/6
bandwidth 1000000
ip address X.X.X.X 255.255.255.240
load-interval 30
negotiation auto
end
Wait a minute. GE interfaces on a 7500 are supposed to be "special"
- GEIP comes on a "special" VIP2-50 that says GEIP, and GEIP+ comes
on a special "VIP4-??" that says GEIP+. I've never done GE on 7500,
but I'd think you shouldn't be swapping out the underlying VIPs
without making sure it's paired correctly with a PA.
pt
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
