Hi Jason, Leigh, Adam & Aivars.
These are serious issues. From the thread it seems 15.3(2)S has multiple 
issues, VRF ping, IPv6 enable causes L3VPN issue & management issues.
Any other issues seen with 15.3(2)S?
Jason, you mentioned that you have seen similar issues with other releases, can 
you please list them?
If I can get a list of issues faced in 15.3(2)S or other releases, it will help 
me to get them fixed soon.
Please send me all the details and I would have them fixed ASAP.

Best Regards,

[http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg]

Waris Sagheer
Technical Marketing Manager
Service Provider Access Group
wa...@cisco.com<mailto:wa...@cisco.com>
Phone: +1 408 853 6682
Mobile: +1 408 835 1389

CCIE - 19901


<http://www.cisco.com/>



[Think before you print.] Think before you print.

This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of 
the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others 
is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to 
receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete 
all copies of this message.

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html



From: Jason Lixfeld <ja...@lixfeld.ca<mailto:ja...@lixfeld.ca>>
Date: Friday, May 10, 2013 3:54 PM
To: Leigh Harrison 
<lharri...@convergencegroup.co.uk<mailto:lharri...@convergencegroup.co.uk>>
Cc: "cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>" 
<cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x L3VPN MPLS problems with 15.3.2S

Interesting.  15.1(2)EY1a doesn't support IPv6, so it's doubtful that unless 
you made any configuration changes at the time of the upgrade to support IPv6, 
the triggers reported by Adam and Aivars aren't consistent with whatever 
triggered your issues.  In fact, I'm not 100% sure yet whether they are 
consistent with whatever triggered mine either.

If you are willing to share your config and topology, I'll pass it off to my SE 
who is the acting as the funnel for the dev team handling this issue (and a few 
others as well).

BTW:  There are some pretty high level Cisco folks watching this thread, so 
anyone else who has been having issues along these lines, I encourage you to 
chime in.  Any info you can share offline with me will make it's way upstream 
in kind.

On 2013-05-10, at 5:04 PM, Leigh Harrison 
<lharri...@convergencegroup.co.uk<mailto:lharri...@convergencegroup.co.uk>> 
wrote:

Evening all,
We went to upgrade our estate to 15.3(2) last weekend, but after the first 
upgrade, we hit the same issue with being up able to ping directly connected 
CPE .  Unable to get the management back up on the CPE, we rolled the change 
back out, reverting to 15.1(2)EY1a and all of our management issues vanished.
Leigh
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Adam 
Vitkovsky
Sent: 10 May 2013 13:07
To: 'Jason Lixfeld'
Cc: 'cisco-nsp'
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x L3VPN MPLS problems with 15.3.2S
I was just playing with this further and it appears that as soon as I configure 
ipv6 address or "ipv6 enable" the interface gets stuck and removing ipv6 won't 
help.
The only cure is to remove the ipv6 address/ipv6 enable and shut and no shut 
the interface than the ping starts to work again.
I don't understand why just ping doesn't work as BGP is not affected by this.
I have this in the lab so I can send you the complete configs offline.
adam
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Lixfeld [mailto:ja...@lixfeld.ca]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 1:46 PM
To: Adam Vitkovsky
Cc: Aivars; cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600x L3VPN MPLS problems with 15.3.2S
I have seen this on a bunch of different ME3600s across my network from 15.2 
all the way up to and including 15.3.  I haven't actually been able to readily 
duplicate this, so I'm very intrigued that you both are able to replicate it, 
seemingly at will.
I actually have a call scheduled at 11am with a fleet of Dev engineers from 
India and SJ.  I will be bringing this up with them, because this is one of our 
big mystery issues that we can't replicate but have seen multiple times.
Can either of you share a *complete* device config? (Passwords, SNMP comma and 
IPs sanitized, if required).  I'd be grateful and hopefully with your help 
we'll be able to put a bugid to this issue.
Thanks.
--
Sent from my mobile device
On 2013-05-10, at 7:26 AM, Adam Vitkovsky 
<adam.vitkov...@swan.sk<mailto:adam.vitkov...@swan.sk>> wrote:
Just ran into a similar problem with 15.2(4)S2 and 15.3(1)S -can't
even ping the other end of the link -funny is that bgp session works
on the CE-PE ip addresses.
So routing vise everything works just fine I just can't pass any data.
However this problem started only when I enabled ipv6 in addition to
the
ipv4 setup.
Debug ip packets for the CE to PE ping shows that the PE got the icmp
and replied back.
Though the ACL in OUT direction on the PE side did not catch any
outgoing icmp traffic and neither the CE received any.
adam
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
Of Aivars
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 10:39 AM
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: [c-nsp] ME3600x L3VPN MPLS problems with 15.3.2S
I tried to deploy Me3600x as MPLS PE with IOS 15.3.2S and failed. It
is a straight forward MPLS L3VPN configuration with OSPF in the core
and static routes between PE - CE. With 15.3 I was not able to ping
even a directly connected CE IP from another PE (7600) in the network.
I was able however ping IP on ME3600 from the same PE - CE subnet. All
routes and labels seem to be fine on both PEs and P as well. I was
able however ping IP on ME3600 from the same PE - CE subnet. The exact
same configuration on the same switch works fine with 15.2S. Just
saved config, rebooted with 15.2 and the ping to the CE direct IP and
statically routed subnet was fine. I was able to replicate the same
behavior using a test
ME3600 connected to MPLS core.
Has anybody seen something like this? I am not able to find any
similar bug in the bug toolkit.
Aivars
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security Cloud System, 
Managed and Supported by TekNet Solutions (http://www.teknet.co.uk) 
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security Cloud System, 
Managed and Supported by TekNet Solutions (http://www.teknet.co.uk)
______________________________________________________________________


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  
cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to