On February 28, 2014 1:33:52 PM CET, Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de> wrote: >Hi, > >On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:49:26PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote: >> While I can appreciate this, history has always proven that >> users will find a use for something for which it wasn't >> initially intended - y'know, like using a Cisco 2901 as a >> core router :-). > ><old age day> >2503 made a good core router, back in the day... (we had two! A 2503 >and a 4500, with a E1 between them...) > >This newfangled 2900 stuff, nobody needs that much RAM in a router! ></old age day> > >gert >-- >USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! > //www.muc.de/~gert/ >Gert Doering - Munich, Germany >g...@greenie.muc.de >fax: +49-89-35655025 >g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Young whippersnapper :-). We had no need of those newfangled 2500s. We had AGS+es and liked it! (Still have a CGS running IOS 8.0 lying about somewhere...) -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/