I think this issue can be taken in a much more practical sense. It's
quite obvious that a very large majority of the people on this list
already work in the technology field, some of which have contacts inside
Cisco. If anyone from Cisco is monitoring this list, or gets copies of
emails that may violate NDA's, it would not be difficult for them to
contact one of the individuals cc'd on the message, or contact the list
owner and track down received: headers from the originating poster. If
you have concerns about NDA violation in what you're posting and don't
want to have your certifications revoked for any reason, then you
probably shouldn't post your question in this public forum.
David
-------------
-----Original Message-----
From: TyRhon144000
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 5/30/00 2:47 PM
Subject: Value of Cisco certifications
Is there any way Cisco can make their certifications
challenging enough,
that they can give a realistic estimate of a person's skills?
I really don't believe that there is such a thing as
paper-certification,
everyone's certification comes on paper and everyone has to do
some
amount
of study to get certified. Yet, as a CCNA myself, I would like
for all
of
Cisco certifications to reflect real world knowledge.
I applaud Cisco for making the CCIE as challenging as it is. I
am also
happy
that just about every CCIE lives up to the NDA. If only those
who have
obtained other certifications from Cisco lives up to the NDA,
then maybe
some of their other certifications will not lose credibility.
Is there anything, that we can do to preserve the credibility
of Cisco
certifications?
T. Knox
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
