What did you expect it to look like? is it affecting anthying ?
Your bridging over the modem. No problem i can see..
NK
"Cai, Land" wrote:
>
> Bob,
>
> Thanks for your detailed posting. The internal LAN segment has same B class
> network as dial-up, it 's because I dial to our dial in server located in
> the other branch office(not dail to internet). We set the ip network to B
> class, while use 24 prefix to subnet it. Now I have resolved this problem.
> I noticed that after dial out, the routing table of the PC be affected, as
> follows:
>
> Before dial out
> 167.65.104.0 255.255.255.0 167.65.104.42 167.65.104.42 1
> after dial our change to
> 167.65.104.0 255.255.255.0 167.65.104.42 167.65.104.42 2
> 167.65.104.0 255.255.255.0 167.65.107.12 167.65.107.12 1
>
> note, 167.65.107.12 is gotten from PPP server IP pool.
> 167.65.104.42 is Ethernet Card IP addr.
> Can you explain why this route table be updated to this appearance. And why
> this happen?
>
> Thanks,
> Cai, land
> CCNA...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Vance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 10:27 PM
> To: CISCO_GroupStudy (E-mail)
> Cc: 'Cai, Land'
> Subject: RE: a question about ip connectivity
>
> What OS are you running on the desktop?
> If Win95, upgrade to MS DUN 1.3.
>
> What does
> route print
> show, both before and after the dial-up connection.
> What is the netmask on your LAN IP address?
>
> You shouldn't have to do anything to have access *to* the Ethernet LAN
> *and* the dial-up network at the same time.
> You will get a default gateway that will allow access to Internet
> sites thru the dial-up, but it shouldn't break access *to* the LAN
> side -- you should still be able to access anything on the LAN side.
>
> I do this every day -- in fact that is how I am connected to send this
> post. I am on a PC on the LAN in my house, talking *through* a Win95 PC
> (running NAT software) that has a LAN card *and* has made a dial-up
> connection to the Internet. This "NAT" PC talks to both the internal
> LAN and the Internet.
>
> The only thing that I see different in your case, is that the LAN is
> a subnet of the *same* Class B network as the dial-up.
> NIC = 167.65.104.42
> PPP = 167.65.107.12
> I would assume that both prefixes are /24, but (and I'm not gonna test
> it), but perhaps DUN has a problem with using subnets of the same
> Classful network for the LAN and the dial-up.
> In my case the PPP "network" is 10 and the LAN is 192.168.1 --
> totally different and no possibility of confusion.
>
> BTW, how is that your internal LAN has the same Class B network address
> as the dial-up?
>
> Now, one final point:
> Joe used the word "across" the LAN (while I specifically said, "to"),
> and he would obviously be correct.
> If you were going to access another "internal" subnet, besides
> 167.65.104.0/24, say, 167.65.200.0/24, then, of course, you'd need
> to have a router on your LAN to that subnet *and* add a static route on
> the PC to that subnet (route add ...) thru that router.
>
> From your post, however, I did not take this last situation to be your
> problem. It seems that you couldn't connect to *other* 167.65.104.X
> guys.
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> Tks | <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> BV | <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sr. Technical Consultant, SBM, A Gates/Arrow Co.
> Vox 770-623-3430 11455 Lakefield Dr.
> Fax 770-623-3429 Duluth, GA 30097-1511
> =================================================
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Joe Martin
> Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 8:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: a question about ip connectivity
>
> When you dial-up, a new default gateway is dynamically added into your
> workstation to point to the dialup gateway. To continue to allow access
> across your LAN also, you will need to have routes to your lan segments.
> These routes could be added statically or could be learned dynamically
> thru
> a routing protocol.
>
> JOE
> CCNP, CCDP, and a few other things...
> CCIE Lab - May 27/28
>
> ""Cai, Land"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Sorry for made a mistake, the IP add of ether Card is 167.65.104.42.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Larkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 6:24 PM
> > To: Cai, Land
> > Subject: RE: a question about ip connectivity
> >
> > you need a route to the other subnet...
> >
> > Andrew Larkins
> > Usko Communications
> > Tel: +2711 236-8000
> > Fax: +2711 236-8350
> > Cell: +2783-656-7214
> > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > "This message may contain information which is confidential and
> subject to
> > legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not
> peruse,
> > use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message. If you have
> received
> > this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by email,
> > facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original
> message."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cai, Land [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 24 May 2000 10:57
> > To: Cisco (E-mail)
> > Subject: a question about ip connectivity
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Supposed to have a desktop, whose ether Card ip is 167.65.107.42
> and
> > have a smooth IP connectivity with other hosts. Now I need to dial up
> to
> > PPP server, and get the IP 167.65.107.12. But at this time, I can
> only do
> > ping 167.65.107.X, while can't ping 167.65.104.X. That's why? And how
> to
> > enable to ping the both IP segments. All the mask is 255.255.255.0.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> > CCNA, MSCE.
> >
> > Cai, land
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ---
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
