Kurt
As a follow up
Forget my first point....  Seems I am thinking of the link address...  when
I think you only intended to show the nets...  thus
I think u can see the rest

Lou Nelson, CCNP, CCDA


----- Original Message -----
From: Lou Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Cisco GroupStudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Kurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2000 2:36 PM
Subject: Re: VLSM Question


> Kurt,
> Let me clear...  My OSPF is weak...  Lotsa study/// ZERO Hands on...  I
work
> with EIGRP, RIP etc... but will start some lab work soon with OSPF to get
> ready for bigger TEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!     enough of the excuses as to why I
> could be wrong... so listen for the crowd to flame me if I stumbled.
>
> Not really.
> 1.  Your e0-s1 are the network addresses... u need to make them the host
> 2.  This is oversummarization.  Your route of 172.16.10.0/27 is a network
of
> .0 a broadcast of .31 and includes all the host from 1-30...
> Example the .27 address (which you have not assigned) exist elsewhere in
> your route domain....  it is lost because of you oversummarization
>
> I suggest
>  int e0 = 172.16.10.1 /30 (net .0  broad .3 host .1 & .2)
>  int e1 = 172.16.10.5 /30 (net .4  broad .7 host .5 & .6)
>  int s0 = 172.16.10.9 /30 (net .8  broad .11 host .9 & .10)
>  int s1 = 172.16.10.13 /30 (net .12  broad .15 host .13 & .14)
>
> Area Border Router.
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!    (folks correct me if I blow it)
>
>  router ospf 23
>  route 172.16.10.0 0.0.0.3 area 1
>  route 172.16.10.4 0.0.0.3 area 2
>  route 172.16.10.8 0.0.0.3 area 3
>  route 172.16.10.12 0.0.0.3 area 4
>  summary-address 172.16.10.0 255.255.255.240
> --
>
> Lou Nelson, CCNP, CCDA
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Kurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2000 1:49 AM
> Subject: VLSM Question
>
>
> > I have four different interfaces on a 2514 router (e0,e1,s0,s1), each
> > interface is on a different subnet, and the mask is 30 bits. Here's they
> > are:
> > int e0 = 172.16.10.4 /30
> > int e1 = 172.16.10.8 /30
> > int s0 = 172.16.10.12 /30
> > int s1 = 172.16.10.16 /30
> > ( I only want two addresses per subnet)
> > I'm running OSPF routing protocol on this router. Each route is
> > configured in a different area, so that makes this router an Area Border
> > Router.
> > here's the logic:
> > router ospf 23
> > route 172.16.10.4 0.0.0.0 area 1
> > route 172.16.10.8 0.0.0.0 area 2
> > route 172.16.10.12 0.0.0.0 area 3
> > route 172.16.10.16 0.0.0.0 area 4
> > I want to summarize the addresses into one route for the routing table.
> > Is this possible?
> > Here's the binaries on the last octet:
> > 4 = .00000100
> > 8 = .00001000
> > 12= .00001100
> > 16= .00010000
> > I came up with summary-address 172.16.10.0 255.255.255.224
> > (ABR script = area 23 range 172.16.10.0 255.255.255.224)
> > Is this correct?
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to