Hi there
I have worked with these beasts before Cisco decided to buy up the whole
kaboodle (Aironet)
They work well as long as you dont have interference concerning line of
sight .
Sometimes they can really get full of sh.. nonsense in a bridge type
environment .
They have to be line of sight and being outdoors & all they can be bastards
to work with .
Metal interferences & so on is not good !!
They work in fog & mist as far as I know , but not when a metal object
ccross/obscure the view/line of sight .
Sitting on top of a Silo's roof in a harbour with a 10 inch kerb with a wind
blowing there really want to make you get of there a.s.a.p
I believe we used 2Meg throughput there . They can work quite a distance .
Ours is in the vicinity of about 4 to 5 kms I think ( thats 3miles = 4.8
kms)
Hope it helps a bit
Cheers
Olden
-----Original Message-----
From: Collin Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 5:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Review of Cisco Aironet
Is anyone using/deployed Cisco's WLAN solution (Aironet)? Good Points and
bad ones. Any other WLAN solution advice appreciated (Lucent, Breezecom). Do
you get a true 11Mbs? What's the range of that 11Mbs? Ect, ect. Thanks in
advance.
Collin
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
