wow.  I guess I threw on enough gas.  I'm personnally a Linux fan.  Just
wanted to see how many responses I could get.  That's quite a sec flaw.
guess I'll have to find another client.  Of which there are most likely to
be flaws in as well.  How about these comments: I'm not using outlook
express on the enterprise backbone!!!!!

Cisco routers are not invulerable, but configured properly are just about
impossible to break into.  Not only that, there's not way in the world a 486
is going to forward traffic like and provide the functionality of a Cisco
router.  Granted there is a large price difference....

PS - I've got an old keyboard at home you can have.  It's missing a few
keys, but using it would be the same as using a Linux router in place of a
Cisco router :)

Kenny

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay Hennigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kenny Sallee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: Switch backplace capacity - how much do you need?


> On Mon, 3 Jul 2000, Kenny Sallee wrote, with the following in his headers:
>
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
>
> > Yea - if you want to put your enterprise on an OS full of security
holes,
> > back doors, and incompatibilities...
>
> You owe me a new keyboard.  I just spewed coffee on mine.
>
> How can anyone running Outhouse Excess throw stones re security holes?
>
> See http://members.xoom.com/malware/0uch.mhtml for a mild example.
>
> Details at http://www.malware.com/
>
> not to mention kak, love-bug, etc., etc.
>
> --
> Jay Hennigan  -  Network Administration  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> NetLojix Communications, Inc.  NASDAQ: NETX  -  http://www.netlojix.com/
> WestNet:  Connecting you to the planet.  805 884-6323
>
>
>

___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to