Hi jeonwoo
I'll try to answer. Anyone can correct me if I am worng.
If you have more than one subnet per vlan you would need a router to
communicate between subnets. If you have more than one vlan per subnet, I
don't think the users would be able to communicate between vlans.
----- Original Message -----
From: "jeongwoo park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 5:05 PM
Subject: subnet vs. Vlan
HI all
I have a question.
Cisco recommends that there be one-to-one relationship
between ip subnets and Vlans.
When the number of devices on a Vlan exceeds the
number of host ip addresses per configured subnet,
more than one subnet can exit on a Vlan.
Having said that, my question;
There are two subnets in a Vlan. Do we need a router
to interconnect these two subnets?
I know that we need a router to interconnect two
different Vlans.
In addtion to that, can more than one vlan exist on a
subnet?
if so, do we still need a router to interconnect
different vlans even if there are in a same subnet?
thanks
jeongwoo
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
