The simple way to think about it is this: VLAN = Subnet. If you do it any
other way you are defeating the purpose of using VLANs (except , of course,
for the earlier example I gave).
Tony
jeongwoo park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> HI all
> I have a question.
> Cisco recommends that there be one-to-one relationship
> between ip subnets and Vlans.
> When the number of devices on a Vlan exceeds the
> number of host ip addresses per configured subnet,
> more than one subnet can exit on a Vlan.
> Having said that, my question;
> There are two subnets in a Vlan. Do we need a router
> to interconnect these two subnets?
> I know that we need a router to interconnect two
> different Vlans.
> In addtion to that, can more than one vlan exist on a
> subnet?
> if so, do we still need a router to interconnect
> different vlans even if there are in a same subnet?
>
> thanks
>
> jeongwoo
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
> http://mail.yahoo.com/
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
