>The simple way to think about it is this: VLAN = Subnet. If you do it any
>other way you are defeating the purpose of using VLANs (except , of course,
>for the earlier example I gave).
>Tony
---
Unfortunately that isn't the case anymore. If you look at what companies
like Extreme are doing in the MAN, they are creating vlan's within the same
IP subnet to provide transparant LAN services across an IP network.
The technnology is called a vMAN - see:
http://www.extremenetworks.com/technology/whitepapers/vman.asp?MakeChange=No
irwin
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
