I'll clarify. On lower end cisco routers not running bgp, yes, it will save you some cpu cycles. But most of the routers I'm working on a day to day basis(12Ks, 10Ks, 7200s) are running full table and hardly get slowed by by acls. Not to mention the problems a null route (for the purpose of bit-bucketing) can do when your're using null routes for bgp.
-Karsten On Thursday 03 April 2003 10:53 am, MADMAN wrote: > Sloppy!? why?? > > Dave > > Karsten wrote: > > Either a sloppy way to drop traffic for a /24, or bgp > > summarization using null routing. > > > > -Karsten > > > > On Thursday 03 April 2003 07:40 am, Anil Gupte wrote: > >>I am trying to understand some IP route commands on our router. Several > >> of them go to Null0 - what does that mean? > >> > >>For example, I have > >>ip route xxx.xxx.xxx.0 255.255.255.0 Null0 200 > >> > >>What is this doing? > >> > >>I need to add another block of class Cs from the same provider. Do I need > >>a similar statement to the above? > >> > >>Thanx for your help. > >>Anil Gupte > >>Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66789&t=66755 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
