Don't you divide the number of collisions by the number of output packets to get the rate? If so, 86548/6314935=0.013, which is pretty close to .1 in my book.
Mark > The Cisco bridge operates in Half-duplex and that is why half-duplex. The > Router is a Cisco 1751 with WIC-1ENET, which is connected to the Wireless > Bridge. > I checked with the "output Interpreter" on CCO and it said the collisions > are more than 0.53 much higher than 0.1 normal rate. > Here's the output of sh interfaces e 0/0 > > Ethernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up > Hardware is PQUICC Ethernet, address is 0004.dd0d.5502 (bia > 0004.dd0d.5502) > Internet address is 172.20.1.2/24 > MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec, > reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255 > Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set > Keepalive set (10 sec) > Half-duplex, 10BaseT > ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00 > Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output hang never > Last clearing of "show interface" counters 3d20h > Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0 > Queueing strategy: weighted fair > Output queue: 0/1000/64/0 (size/max total/threshold/drops) > Conversations 0/5/256 (active/max active/max total) > Reserved Conversations 0/0 (allocated/max allocated) > Available Bandwidth 7200 kilobits/sec > 5 minute input rate 53000 bits/sec, 13 packets/sec > 5 minute output rate 8000 bits/sec, 13 packets/sec > 4528216 packets input, 642790340 bytes, 0 no buffer > Received 176451 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles > 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored > 0 input packets with dribble condition detected > 6314935 packets output, 279254727 bytes, 0 underruns > 59281 output errors, 86548 collisions, 0 interface resets > 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred > 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier > 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out > > Thanks, > > neil > > > ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Collisions go up normally with load. What is the load? Could something > else > > (an attack or trojan horse or just excitement about your terrific content) > > have caused the load to go way up? > > > > Cisco says that no more than 0.1 percent of frames should experience > > collisions. How many frames have there been in the time that the > collisions > > went up? How does that compare to your baseline? > > > > By the way, why do you have the interfaces set to half duplex? Why don't > you > > set them them to full since it's a point-to-point link? > > > > Priscilla > > > > neil K wrote: > > > > > > One of my Cisco router's Ethernet interface connected to a > > > Cisco Wireless > > > Bridges has the interface collisions counter increasing > > > rapidly. Over a > > > period of 48 hrs the collision counter was 60,000 and the > > > output error > > > counter was more than 40000. Both the Ethernet interface on the > > > router and > > > the Cisco Wireless bridge are set to 10/Half-duplex. > > > There is nothing in between the bridge and the Router Ethernet, > > > connected by > > > a cross-over cable. What could be causing this. > > > > > > Any comments, > > > > > > neil Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71278&t=71176 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
