thanks 

do u have any good url or pdf which contains detail
info about this statitics (like 4/255. if u have pl.
mal to me.

regards


--- "Croyle, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, not sure what everyone has recommended here, but
> the load you have on
> the interface is 4/255 which I believe is a running
> 5 minute average so
> taking workstations off the segment is not correct
> IMHO.  Also where you are
> right now is .03% which is below the .1% tolerance
> acceptable.  Sooooo...
> reset the counters, and see over the next 10 to 30
> minutes what happens,
> (resend the show int to us).
> 
> Jim  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Deane, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 10:14 AM
> To: 'rayza manesh'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: collision
> 
> 
> 
> Ummmmmm.  My understanding is that collisions are
> normal with a hub.  The
> hub itself is a single collision domain, as opposed
> to a switch wherein each
> port is a collision domain.  So, I don't think that
> you can get rid of
> collisions in a hub environment.  You could reduce
> them by eliminating
> workstations from the hub, or by reducing the amount
> of traffic that each
> station is generating (i.e. eliminate applications.)
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rayza manesh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 8:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: collision
> 
> 
> I have the same problem (collisions on the switch
> port connecting to a 10 
> base-t hub.) And the switch port is set on speed 10.
> Any idea?
> Thanks
> Rayza
> 
> 
> >From: "Jim Deane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Jim Deane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: collision
> >Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2000 07:36:04 -0500
> >
> >I have seen collisions like this as a result of a
> duplex mismatch between
> >the router interface and the switch port. 
> Autonegotiation doesn't always
> >work reliably, especially between vendors.  You may
> want to specify the
> >speed and duplex of both the router's interface,
> and the switch port that
> >the router is plugged into.
> >
> >
> >HTH,
> >Jim
> >
> >
> >+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> >"Cisco Study" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> message
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > could any one tell me why collisions counter
> increases
> > > on ethernet port ....what should i do to prevent
> > > this.....Thanks in adv
> > >
>
*****************************************************
> > > sh int e 0/0
> > > Ethernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up
> > >   Hardware is AmdP2, address is 0010.7be1.6cc1
> (bia
> > > 0010.7be1.6cc1)
> > >   Internet address is 202.41.11.40/24
> > >   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 10000 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec,
> rely
> > > 255/255, load 4/255
> > >   Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set,
> keepalive set
> > > (10 sec)
> > >   ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
> > >   Last input 00:00:00, output 00:00:00, output
> hang
> > > never
> > >   Last clearing of "show interface" counters
> 19:30:29
> > >   Queueing strategy: fifo
> > >   Output queue 0/40, 54 drops; input queue 0/75,
> 0
> > > drops
> > >   5 minute input rate 830000 bits/sec, 126
> packets/sec
> > >   5 minute output rate 195000 bits/sec, 113
> > > packets/sec
> > >      2135956 packets input, 1236837647 bytes, 0
> no
> > > buffer
> > >      Received 205775 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0
> giants, 0
> > > throttles
> > >      0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun,
> 0
> > > ignored, 0 abort
> > >      0 input packets with dribble condition
> detected
> > >      2503462 packets output, 859332285 bytes, 0
> > > underruns
> > >      0 output errors, **305764 collisions**, 0
> > > interface resets
> > >      0 babbles, 0 late collision, 35665 deferred
> > >      0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier
> > >      0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers
> > > swapped out
> > > SPZRTR1#
> > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
> > > http://invites.yahoo.com/
> > >
> > > ___________________________________
> > > UPDATED Posting Guidelines:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com
> > > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > ---
> >
> >
> >___________________________________
> >UPDATED Posting Guidelines:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> >FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com
> >Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>
________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
> http://www.hotmail.com
> 
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com/

___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to