We recently added another interface, S1/1, that connects a private line to another school. We are routing 156.3.37.0 to them. Should I have route statements that say
ip route 156.3.37.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.2 or ip route 156.3.37.0 255.255.255.0 Serial1/1 Current config: ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/0 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/1 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial1/0 ip route 65.165.174.0 255.255.254.0 FastEthernet0/0 ip route 156.3.37.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.2 ip route 198.182.157.0 255.255.255.0 65.165.175.253 ip route 207.233.56.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.2 I am interested if there is a performance difference between these two route statements or any other reason why one would be preferred over the other. TIA. -- Karyn Williams, CNE Network Services Manager California Institute of the Arts [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.calarts.edu/network Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72406&t=72406 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
