The link did not get sent. I would like to check it out if you have it. Thanks for your help.
At 12:44 PM 7/17/03 GMT, you wrote: >So I guess it's now 1,000,001 times :-)) Still, I don't blame anyone for >believing this urban legend of the networking world when authorities such as >Doyle and Caslow continue to propagate it. I just wonder how the AD=0 rumor >ever got started. > >However, although the AD=1 for both routes, they are not the same in all >respects. One important difference-- with the interface form, the router >considers any host reachable through that interface to be directly connected >and so ARPs for its address. This does not happen for all hosts with a >numeric next hop. > >This might not make a difference in the case given, but suppose your default >route pointed to an interface rather than a numeric next hop? > >See >for a more detailed exmple and explanation. > > > > > >Sasa Milic wrote: >> >> This was discussed a milion times; static route that >> points to an interface has AD=1. >> >> Sasa >> CCIE #8635 >> >> >> Nakul Malik wrote: >> > >> > by default, a static route has an AD of 1. >> > If the static route points to an exit interface, the AD=0. >> > >> > That is the only difference >> > >> > HTH. >> > >> > -Nakul >> > >> > ""Karyn Williams"" wrote in message >> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > We recently added another interface, S1/1, that connects a >> private line to >> > > another school. We are routing 156.3.37.0 to them. Should I >> have route >> > > statements that say >> > > >> > > ip route 156.3.37.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.2 >> > > >> > > or >> > > >> > > ip route 156.3.37.0 255.255.255.0 Serial1/1 >> > > >> > > Current config: >> > > >> > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/0 >> > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/1 >> > > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial1/0 >> > > ip route 65.165.174.0 255.255.254.0 FastEthernet0/0 >> > > ip route 156.3.37.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.2 >> > > ip route 198.182.157.0 255.255.255.0 65.165.175.253 >> > > ip route 207.233.56.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.2 >> > > >> > > >> > > I am interested if there is a performance difference >> between these two >> > > route statements or any other reason why one would be >> preferred over the >> > > other. TIA. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > >> > > Karyn Williams, CNE >> > > Network Services Manager >> > > California Institute of the Arts >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > http://www.calarts.edu/network >> -- >> >> Regards, >> Sasa >> CCIE #8635 -- Karyn Williams, CNE Network Services Manager California Institute of the Arts [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.calarts.edu/network Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72488&t=72406 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
