Jason J wrote: > > well, in my thoughts, there is no loading balance in ospf.
There is, just not between processes. > it > will choose only one route and put it into its ospf routing > table. > also i got a case: when there is a route from EBGP peer which > is 192.168.0.0/19 and also a route comes from static input > which is 192.168.0.0/18, which one do you think > the router will pick ?? > the answer is : the route from EBGP! The answer is "both routes will be in the routing table and it depends on the destination address of the packet which one will be used for forwarding." Obviously, you can't forward a packet to 192.168.32.x based on a route to 192.168.0.0/19. Thanks, Zsombor > > Jason G.F CCNP > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73781&t=73727 -------------------------------------------------- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
