Jason J wrote: > > Fred is right > all routes from different routing protocals will be put > into route table ,but!! even if they are the same !
Would be surprising. IMHO one route (meaning a prefix+mask combo) can be installed only by one routing process. Can you post some 'show ip route' output that shows otherwise? > and what i mean in the last article is the "ospf routing > table", not route table.even there can be more same network > link in its ospf database. > > the router will choose which protocol's route/routes to use. > but i do not think the same ospf process will load balanc > inside it. So what do you suppose would happen if there are multiple equal cost routes to the same destination? Every reasonable routing protocol can do load-balancing, I am surprised that anyone would doubt that OSPF can do it, too. > what if the EIGRP load balance,but the router decide to use the > static or ospf route ?? If the router decided to use the static or OSPF route, then obviously the EIGRP route(s) won't play any role. > and what if different ospf processes learn the same routes to > the same destination i mean what the router will do then??(the > concrete operations) See my first post in this thread. > what will the IOS do ? maybe at the time when we start the > OSPF processes it will not permit us to overlap the same > network address > at all !! i am not sure about that. You can't put the same interface into multiple OSPF processes but that doesn't mean that the two processes can't learn about the same network. Thanks, Zsombor Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=73787&t=73727 -------------------------------------------------- **Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store: http://shop.groupstudy.com FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
